Jeff Hebert
President

Unlocking Lower-Cost Robotic Automation

Moving Beyond Over-Built

When engineers design a robot to perform an automated task, the robot is typically built or selected for the worst-case scenario of moving the largest expected mass in the highest number of degrees of freedom while maintaining sufficient accuracy for the job. That’s a tall order and it leads to expensive, heavy, over-built robots. In addition, highly-accurate robotic systems can require expensive secondary encoders which are only needed for the final step of alignment to account for calibration of joint positions and tolerances in the system.

Think about an ice skater, lifting his partner above his head. The motion is fluid, leverages momentum, and is performed with a strikingly-high payload-to-weight ratio. Classic approaches to robotic actuation and open-loop encoding often fail to achieve the same performance criteria.

Accuracy At Scale

Another key challenge for automated robotics is scaling across large work areas and workpieces. While most robots are great at performing small-scale, precise tasks relatively close to their fixed bases, that approach is very limiting and can also further drive up the cost of automation when the work area is large—it requires many robots to cover that larger area or a single, especially over-built robot to do the large-scale job on its own.

Consider an order picker running through an online retailer’s warehouse. This person is able to perform a series of varied tasks and adapt their frame of reference and accuracy for the task at hand across a huge work area. This is possible because humans use our eyes as an outside-in tracking system for our hands and feet. As Elon Musk recently said with respect to automation at Tesla, “humans are underrated.” Classic approaches to automate this task require a plethora of different robots working together to divide up the labor (which can be expensive) or highly-sophisticated and expensive vision and navigation systems to let robots move around the space (which then don’t match the accuracy of rigid, fixed-base robots).

Outside-In Tracking Benefits

We see a breakthrough opportunity to change the design paradigm for some automation use cases to unlock much lower-cost and fit-for-purpose robots. We see that moving from (or supplementing) the “inside out” encoding most robotic actuators currently use in order to know their position and orientation in space to an “outside-in” approach which can establish the absolute position and orientation of the robot and correct for motion and deflection is a game changer. Imagine a robotic arm as light as a swing-arm lamp, deflecting when picking up a payload, but being able to correct for this deflection in real time—most robots are so rigid and over-built that we never see deflection like this. Imagine a robot moving around a large space and still performing tasks with sub-millimeter accuracy.

With this approach, we can create much cheaper, lighter-weight robots that maintain high accuracy, enabling them to go many more places than are affordable today. This approach can also extend to human augmentation as well where we can add accuracy to a task a person is roughly guiding by adding this absolute position tracking, much like this handheld CNC router, but without the need for stickers to orient the system. This opens up new opportunities with cobotics (human-robot collaboration), not just automation.

Outside-in tracking systems have historically not been accurate enough or have been too expensive, but we’ve been working on a system for years now through our work with Valve on SteamVR and see it as a breakthrough to lower-cost robots—off-the-shelf object trackers and SteamVR Lighthouses are only about $135 each.

We’re so excited about the potential applications of this paradigm shifting approach that we’re investing in a demonstration to show just how lightweight and inexpensive an accurate robot can be—stay tuned!

Oops! Something went wrong! Please try again!
CONTACT US

See what else is new...

November 16, 2020

[Watch] How to Incorporate Sustainability into Your Product Development Process

Learn about the methods the Synapse team has developed for understanding how to achieve sustainability goals for a new product in this TEDx Talk with Mechanical Engineering Tech Lead, Will Harrison.

November 2, 2020

Synapse’s Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion Evolution

Over the last six years, we’ve made an effort to build diversity, equity, and inclusion into the fabric of our organization. From the beginning, we’ve taken an iterative approach, revisiting our initiatives, processes, and policies to make improvements over time, multiple times. Now that we’ve made significant progress, we want to share insights that we hope will help you make positive change at your own organization.

See what else is new...

October 19, 2020

The ME Team Goes Virtual: 4 Ways We’ve Tackled the Challenge of Making Things in a Virtual World

The mechanical engineering team at Synapse has gotten creative in finding solutions for working together remotely. Following Ann Torres’ (our VP of Engineering in San Francisco) great discussion with Fictiv and Cooper Perkins on How to build a Physical Product in the Virtual New World, our team tackled some of the same challenges and developed solutions of our own.

July 29, 2020

Has VR Improved Enough for the Mainstream?

With major improvements happening in virtual reality technology and many companies operating remotely in the face of unprecedented health and safety concerns, is COVID the perfect time for VR to finally go mainstream?

July 22, 2020

The Alpha Prototype: Be Smart or Look Good (It’s Hard to Do Both!)

Are you a startup developing a prototype needed to reach your next fundraising milestone? Or are you on the path to mass production? Either way, there's an Alpha prototype in your future—but, they're not all created equal. Ian Graves, Mechanical Engineering Program Lead, describes a few different Alpha prototype scenarios and discusses some of the downsides and highlights of each.